From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christopher v. Vang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
Case No. 2:09-CV-3584 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-CV-3584 KJN P

09-28-2011

DELBERT CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY VANG, Defendant.

GREGORY P. EINHORN Attorneys for Defendant DEPUTY VANG


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY, DISCLOSURE

OF EXPERT WITNESSES, AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINES

Pursuant to Local Rule 143 and 144, the parties in the above-captioned case stipulate to a 90-day extension for the respective deadlines to conduct discovery, to disclose expert witnesses, and for pretrial motions.

The parties have previously stipulated to extensions for these deadlines to obtain records from California State Prison Corcoran ("CSP-C"), where Plaintiff Delbert Christopher is currently incarcerated; to retain experts willing to travel to Corcoran; and to schedule a medical exam. In June 2011, Plaintiff's medical expert examined Mr. Christopher at CSP-C and determined that an MRI is necessary to evaluate the injury. Plaintiff's counsel has been coordinating with CSP-C to conduct the MRI; however, as the timing of the MRI is left to the discretion of CSP-C, it is unclear when the MRI will be conducted. Given the time it has taken thus far to obtain records and arrange for the initial medical exam, the parties stipulate to a 90-day extension of the current pretrial deadlines listed below:

Currently, the deadline to conduct discovery is September 29, 2011, and the parties stipulate to a 90-day extension to conduct discovery until December 28, 2011. This is the second extension sought by the parties to extend the discovery deadline.

Currently, the deadline for expert witness disclosure is October 6, 2011, and the parties stipulate to a 90-day extension to disclose each party's experts until January 4, 2012. This is the fifth extension sought by the parties to extend the deadline for expert disclosure.

Currently, the deadline for pretrial motions is October 31, 2011, and the parties stipulate to a 90-day extension to conduct pretrial motions until January 29, 2012. This is the second extension for the pretrial motion deadline sought by the parties.

Respectfully submitted,

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P

INA D. CHANG

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DELBERT CHRISTOPHER

GREGORY P. EINHORN

Attorneys for Defendant

DEPUTY VANG

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, WITH CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS THE AFOREMENTIONED DEADLINES ARE MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

Discovery may be conducted until December 28, 2011;

The deadline for expert witness disclosures is extended to January 4, 2012; and

The deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to March 2, 2012.

SO ORDERED.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Christopher v. Vang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
Case No. 2:09-CV-3584 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Christopher v. Vang

Case Details

Full title:DELBERT CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY VANG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-CV-3584 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)