Christopher v. Hoshino

Full title: REGINALD CHRISTOPHER, Petitioner, v. MARTIN HOSHINO, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 12, 2013

EDCV 12-2267 GAF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)

Opinion

REGINALD CHRISTOPHER, Petitioner, v. MARTIN HOSHINO, Respondent. No. EDCV 12-2267 GAF (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California. December 12, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Petition on the merits with prejudice.