Opinion
Case No. 04-70054.
February 17, 2006
OPINION AND ORDER
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 5, 2005, Defendants filed a Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties' papers and the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. MICH. LR 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
II. DISCUSSION
On March 22, 2005, this Court entered a judgment dismissing Plaintiff's case with prejudice. On June 8, 2005, this Court entered an order denying Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. As the time for appeal has long passed, the entering of a stipulated motion for dismissal would be superfluous. In addition, Plaintiff's signature does not appear on the stipulated motion to dismiss.
IV. CONCLUSION
For the above reasons, Defendants' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.