From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christman v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 13, 1922
245 S.W. 916 (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

No. 7367.

Decided December 13, 1922

Burglary — Plea of Guilty — Practice on Appeal.

Where, upon trial of burglary, defendant entered his plea of guilty, under a due warning by the court, and there appearing no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from the District Court of Collin. Tried below before the Honorable F.E. Wilcox.

Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, three years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

R.G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Collin County of the offense of burglary, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. By it we are informed that after being duly warned by the court below of the consequences of his act as is directed by statute, appellant entered his plea of guilty before the jury of the offense and his punishment was fixed as aforesaid. The indictment charged burglary in the usual form, and no error appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Christman v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 13, 1922
245 S.W. 916 (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Christman v. the State

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT CHRISTMAN, alias J.E. MOORE, v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 13, 1922

Citations

245 S.W. 916 (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)
245 S.W. 916