From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 5, 2001
795 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-4013

Opinion filed September 5, 2001

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Cynthia G. Angelos, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-944 CF.

Shawn E. Christie, Milton, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse in part the summary denial of appellant's motion for post conviction relief. Appellant claims that the videotape the state used at trial was altered and that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to object to the admission of the videotape. These claims are the proper subjects of a motion for post conviction relief. See Jackson v. State, 711 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The transcript of the audio portion of the videotape does not refute appellant's allegation that differences in the contrast and darkness of the images on the videotape indicate tampering.

The case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing on those claims only. The order denying appellant's motion for post conviction relief is affirmed in all other respects.

STONE, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Christie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 5, 2001
795 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Christie v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN E. CHRISTIE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 5, 2001

Citations

795 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Christie v. State

March 1, 2005. Appeal from the 4th DCA 795 So.2d 1018. Decision without published…