Thus, it was not the elevation of the conduit or cables that caused the risk. See e.g., Davis v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 86 A.D.3d 907. 928 N.Y.S.2d 377 (3rd Dep't 2011); Simmons v. City of New York, 165 A.D.3d 725, 85 N.Y.S.3d 462 (2d Dep't 2018); Christie v. Live Nation Concerts, Inc., 192 A.D.3d 971, 145 N.Y.S.3d 98 (2021); see also Parrino v. Ravert, 208 A.D.3d 672, 173 N.Y.3d 618 (Sup. Ct. Kings Co. 2022) (plaintiff not engaged in elevation related risk when he was injured when 20 unsecured panels of sheetrock, toppled and pinned him against the wall); Vargas v. Toll GC LLC, 2021 N.Y. Mise. LEXIS 8386 (Queens Co. Sup. Ct. 2021) (plaintiff injured when an A-frame cart containing several heavy stone kitchen countertops, tipped onto plaintiff while he attempted to move the cart); Markowskiv.Dolp 1133 Props. II LLC, 2021 N.Y. Mise. LEXIS 1423 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 2021) (plaintiff injured when construction debris container rolled down a sloped sidewalk, striking him. Court held the alleged incident did not involve an elevation risk as the sidewalk slope was less than 1.6 degrees and the loading dock surface was less than one foot higher than the loading area).