Opinion
2:20-cv-00115-KJD-DJA
08-02-2022
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its Individual Capacity but as Trustee of ARLP Trust 3. SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277, Attorneys for Defendants, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its Individual Capacity but as Trustee of ARLP Trust 3.
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277, Attorneys for Defendants, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME PERIOD TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 20] [FIRST REQUEST]
COMES NOW Plaintiff, Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its Individual Capacity but as Trustee of ARLP Trust 3 (“Christiana Trust”) and Defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On June 17, 2022, Christiana Trust filed its First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 19];
2. On July 18, 2022, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 20];
3. Christiana Trust's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is currently August 1, 2022;
4. Christiana Trust's counsel is requesting an extension until Wednesday, August 31, 2022, to file its response to the pending Motion to Dismiss;
5. This extension is requested to allow counsel for Christiana Trust additional time to review and respond to the points and authorities cited to in the pending Motions;
6. Counsel for Defendants do not oppose the requested extension;
7. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.