Opinion
21-5104
08-13-2021
Patrick O. Christian, Appellant v. United States of America, et al., Appellees
No. 1:21-cv-00080-UNA
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Wilkins and Rao, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed February 19, 2021, and March 16, 2021 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant's case on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and appellant has shown no error in the district court's decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). In addition, appellant has not shown any abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of reconsideration. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.