From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christian v. Reynolds-Christian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 16, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-00133 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 16, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-00133

07-16-2019

TONYA CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff, v. SHONDA REYNOLDS-CHRISTIAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 18), recommending that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Chelsea Wade and Caitlyn Febles (the "DCS Defendants") (Doc. No. 15) be granted. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The failure to object to a report and recommendation releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Frias v. Frias, No. 2:18-cv-00076, 2019 WL 549506, at * 2 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2019); Hart v. Bee Property Mgmt., Case No. 18-cv-11851, 2019 WL 1242372, at * 1 (E.D. Mich. March 18, 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The district court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, those aspects of the report and recommendation to which no objection is made. Ashraf v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., 322 F. Supp. 3d 879, 881 (W.D. Tenn. 2018); Benson v. Walden Security, Case No. 3:18-cv-0010, 2018 WL 6322332, at * 3 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2018). The district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and rulings to which no specific objection is filed. Id.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. Plaintiff failed not only to object to the Report and Recommendation, but also to file any opposition to the pending Motion to Dismiss to begin with. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved for this reason, and also because the reasoning and conclusions set forth in the Report and Recommendation are sound.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Wade and Febles are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

ELI RICHARDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Christian v. Reynolds-Christian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 16, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-00133 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Christian v. Reynolds-Christian

Case Details

Full title:TONYA CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff, v. SHONDA REYNOLDS-CHRISTIAN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 16, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-00133 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 16, 2019)

Citing Cases

McGuire v. Tennessee

As the Court has explained, the enforcement of child support “falls squarely under the domestic relations…

McGuire v. State

The enforcement of child support “falls squarely under the domestic relations exception.” Lawrence v.…