From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christensen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 30, 2022
4:21-cv-0648-P (N.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-cv-0648-P

08-30-2022

Maria Delcarmen Christensen,Plaintiff, v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MARK T. PITTMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is an action seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff Maria Delcarmen Christensen's application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. See ECF No. 1. This action was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton, for submission to this Court of findings, conclusions and recommendations (“FCRs”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 1, 2022, Judge Cureton submitted Findings and Conclusions and recommended that the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision. See ECF No. 22. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's FCR is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.

Therefore, the Court ACCEPTs the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Conclusions as its own. Accordingly, the Court AFFiRMs the final decision of the Commissioner and DisMissEs this action.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Christensen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 30, 2022
4:21-cv-0648-P (N.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Christensen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:Maria Delcarmen Christensen,Plaintiff, v. Commissioner, Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

4:21-cv-0648-P (N.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2022)

Citing Cases

Morales v. O'Malley

An SVP of 7, which is required in the administrative assistant position, is defined as “over 2 years and up…