From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chrimar Sys., Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 4, 2013
501 F. App'x 977 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1641

04-04-2013

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as CMS Technologies, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOUNDRY NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

RICHARD W. HOFFMANN, Reising Ethington PC, of Troy, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant. NEAL KUMAR KATYAL, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were FREDERICK LIU; K.T. CHERIAN and CONSTANCE F. RAMOS, of San Francisco, California. Of counsel was ELIZABETH BARCHAS PRELOGAR, of Washington, DC.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 06-CV-13936, Judge Avern Cohn.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD W. HOFFMANN, Reising Ethington PC, of Troy, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

NEAL KUMAR KATYAL, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were FREDERICK LIU; K.T. CHERIAN and CONSTANCE F. RAMOS, of San Francisco, California. Of counsel was ELIZABETH BARCHAS PRELOGAR, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Chrimar Sys., Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 4, 2013
501 F. App'x 977 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Chrimar Sys., Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as CMS Technologies, Inc.)…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

501 F. App'x 977 (Fed. Cir. 2013)