From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Choyce v. Melendez

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 11, 2010
No. C 09-01528 MHP (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 09-01528 MHP.

August 11, 2010


ORDER


On April 29, 2010, defendants in this action filed a notice of the report of the death of plaintiff Edward Lee Choyce. Docket No. 41 (Notice). On May 1, 2010, the court entered an order requiring that if plaintiff's next of kin or legal representative desired to prosecute the action, they must file a motion for substitution of party no later than July 29, 2010. Docket No. 43. The court indicated that if no such motion was filed by that deadline, the action would be dismissed. Id.

The deadline for filing a motion for substitution of party has now passed without any action having been taken by plaintiff's next of kin or other legal representative. For the foregoing reasons, the complaint in this action is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Procedure. The Clerk of Court shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Choyce v. Melendez

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 11, 2010
No. C 09-01528 MHP (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Choyce v. Melendez

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LEE CHOYCE, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY MELENDEZ et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 11, 2010

Citations

No. C 09-01528 MHP (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2010)