From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chou v. Okra, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jan 17, 2007
C 06-2535 PVT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2007)

Opinion


HSIN TE CHOU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OKRA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 06-2535 PVT United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. January 17, 2007

          ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

          PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL, Magistrate Judge.

         On December 11, 2006, the parties filed a Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice. On December 13, 2006, this court issued an interim order deeming the stipulation to be a joint motion to approve the fairness of the settlement of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), and setting a deadline for the parties to submit a joint statement in support of the settlement. The parties have submitted their Joint Statement on Fairness of Settlement. Based on the parties joint statement, and the file herein,

The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court FINDS that the compromise of Plaintiff Chou's and Plaintiff Garcia's overtime and liquidated damages claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act is a fair compromise of Fair Labor Standards Act claims as to which there are bona fide factual disputes.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, based on this finding, the court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice as to Plaintiffs' Hsin Te Chou and Celestino Garcia, and without prejudice as to any putative members of the purported class. The court retains jurisdiction over the parties' settlement.


Summaries of

Chou v. Okra, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jan 17, 2007
C 06-2535 PVT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Chou v. Okra, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HSIN TE CHOU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OKRA, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2007

Citations

C 06-2535 PVT (N.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2007)