Opinion
CR 92-1393
Opinion delivered December 21, 1992
APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK DENIED — NO ADMISSION BY ATTORNEY. — Where the motion for rule on the clerk admitted that the record was not timely filed and that is was no fault of the appellant, but counsel for appellant failed to concede it was his fault that the record was not filed or to show other good cause to grant the motion, the motion was denied.
Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied.
Kearney Law Offices, for appellant.
No response.
Brenda Chorn, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.
The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.
However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Brenda Chorn will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.