From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Choppolla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 4, 1992
594 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-01941.

March 4, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Mr. Choppolla was charged with theft of an automobile. He pled to the lesser offense of trespass to a conveyance, and an order of restitution was entered on that conviction. At the restitution hearing, the defendant objected to the entry of the restitution order because the state had not established that the proposed damages were directly or indirectly related to the punished offense. See Salvador v. State, 1992 WL 16023, 17 F.L.W. D374 (Fla.2d DCA Jan. 29, 1992). The trial court entered the restitution order without requiring the state to prove this connection. Accordingly, we strike the order of restitution.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Choppolla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 4, 1992
594 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Choppolla v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN CHOPPOLLA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 4, 1992

Citations

594 So. 2d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)