From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chojnacki v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 6, 2008
119 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-0991.

August 6, 2008.

Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals' Entry filed May 5, 2008:

"[W]hether a decision denying a request for appointment of counsel in a reclassification hearing held pursuant to Ohio's version of the Adam Walsh Act, Senate Bill 10, is a final appealable order."

O'DONNELL, J., dissents.

The conflict case is King v. State (Mar. 19, 2008), Miami App. No. 2008-CA-2.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Rogers, Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040.


Summaries of

Chojnacki v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 6, 2008
119 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008)
Case details for

Chojnacki v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:Chojnacki v. Rogers

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 6, 2008

Citations

119 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008)
2008 Ohio 3880

Citing Cases

In re Objection to Reclassification Brown

Chojnacki, 12th Dist. No. CA2008-03-040. We recognized that this case is in conflict with State v. King (May…