From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chodosh v. Greenblum

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 13, 1949
193 Misc. 804 (N.Y. App. Term 1949)

Opinion

January 13, 1949.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Kings County, KOPFF, J.

Garry G. Blaustein and Aaron L. Rosen for appellant.

Joseph A. Weinstein for respondent.


In this action by the seller for damages for breach of a contract to sell real property, the check sued upon as the "note or memorandum" was signed on its face by the defendant, as maker, but he did not sign the memorandum on the reverse side, setting forth the terms of the contract. Accordingly, it was not "subscribed by the party to be charged" as required by section 259 Real Prop. of the Real Property Law. ( James v. Patten, 6 N.Y. 9; 300 West End Ave. Corp. v. Warner, 250 N.Y. 221; Bisgeier v. Keller, 122 Misc. 705, affd. 214 A.D. 758; Robinson v. Karr, 273 A.D. 790; 2 Williston on Contracts [Rev. ed.], § 585; 112 A.L.R. 938.)

The order should be unanimously reversed on the law and motion granted, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements.

STEINBRINK, FENNELLY and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Chodosh v. Greenblum

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 13, 1949
193 Misc. 804 (N.Y. App. Term 1949)
Case details for

Chodosh v. Greenblum

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS CHODOSH, Respondent, v. HYMAN GREENBLUM, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1949

Citations

193 Misc. 804 (N.Y. App. Term 1949)
87 N.Y.S.2d 8