From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Choctaw Nation v. Shull

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Mar 6, 1968
396 F.2d 583 (10th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 9574.

March 6, 1968.

Lon Kile, Hugo, Okla., for appellants.

Hal Welch, Hugo, Okla., for appellees.

Before PICKETT, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.


This is another case like Choctaw Nation v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, 10 Cir., 396 F.2d 578, to which reference is made.

Here we are concerned with a tract about 40 acres in size on which the St. Louis San Francisco Railway Company obtained a reservoir easement in 1902. The appellees-defendants are abutting landowners. The railroad abandoned the easement at some unstated date. In 1955 some of the appellees obtained a judgment against the successor to the original holder of the easement in which it was found that the reservoir use had been abandoned. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the abutting landowners.

This case is controlled by Choctaw Nation v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company, supra. On the abandonment of the easement, the title vested in the abutting landowners.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Choctaw Nation v. Shull

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Mar 6, 1968
396 F.2d 583 (10th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Choctaw Nation v. Shull

Case Details

Full title:CHOCTAW NATION and Chickasaw Nation, Appellants, v. C.G. SHULL, Jr., and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 1968

Citations

396 F.2d 583 (10th Cir. 1968)