Opinion
1:21-CV-00996-DAD-JLT
08-09-2021
D. MALAMA CHOCK, Plaintiff, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, A MICHIGAN CORPORATION; STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, AN ENTITY OF UNKNOWN FORM; STRYKER GMBH, A SWISS COMPANY, Defendants.
D. Joshua Staub, Attorney for Plaintiff D. Malama Chock.
D. Joshua Staub, Attorney for Plaintiff D. Malama Chock .
[PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION AS TO STRYER ORTHOPAEDICS AND STRYKER GMBH ONLY (DOC. 9)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
[Proposed] Order
The parties stipulated to the action being dismissed as to Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only. (Doc. 11) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only .
IT IS SO ORDERED.