From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cho v. UCBH Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 11, 2015
Master Case CV-09-4208-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)

Opinion

          Laurence M. Rosen, THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A., Los Angeles, CA, and Jonathan Stern, Esq. (pro hac vice) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A., New York, New York, Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs.

          MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Stuart C. Plunkett, Attorneys for Outside Director Defendants Dennis Wu, Joseph J. Jou, Li-Lin Ko, Godwin S. Wong, David Ng, Daniel P. Riley and Richard Li-Chung Wang

          LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Steven M. Bauer, Attorneys for Defendant Thomas S. Wu

          COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP Edward L. Seidel, Attorneys for Defendant Thomas Yu

          ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP Jeffrey L. Borenstein, Attorneys for Defendant Burton D. Thompson

          BERGESON, LLP Caroline McIntyre, Attorneys for Defendants Daniel M. Gautsch, Douglas Mitchell, and Robert Nagel.

          FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP William P. Keane, Attorneys for Defendant John M. Kerr.

          SWANSON & McNAMARA LLP Mary McNamara, Attorneys for Defendant John Cinderey.

          MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY James A. Lassart, Attorneys for Defendant Ebrahim Shabudin.

          CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP Nanci L. Clarence, Attorneys for Defendant Craig S. On.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

          JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws on August 10, 2010;

         WHEREAS, this Court entered an Order on September 16, 2014, staying this case until the conclusion of United States v. Shabudin and Yu;

         WHEREAS, this Court entered an Order on April 21, 2015, lifting the stay, referring the parties to Judge Beeler for the purposes of completing a settlement conference by July 21, 2015, and setting a case management conference for July 31, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.;

         WHEREAS, following the parties' request to stay the above-referenced case management conference, the court stayed the conference to November 13, 2015;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel has an unforeseen family obligation on November 13, 2015 outside of the country that cannot be moved.

         THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties and their respective counsel of record, that the Case Management Conference in this matter currently scheduled for November 13, 2015, should be continued, and ask that the Court continue the Case Management Conference to December 4, 2015, or as soon thereafter as the Court shall require.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference scheduled for November 13, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. is continued to December 4, at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall submit an updated case management statement by no later than November 20, 2015.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cho v. UCBH Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 11, 2015
Master Case CV-09-4208-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Cho v. UCBH Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KYUNG CHO; REX DECHAKUL; AND DAVID HWANG; INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 11, 2015

Citations

Master Case CV-09-4208-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)