Opinion
No. SC12–838.
2013-01-14
Linda Lan CHMURA, Petitioner(s) v. John W. JAGO, Respondent(s).
The following cases are hereby consolidated for disposition: Chmura v. Sam Rodgers Properties, Inc., Case No. SC12–836;Chmura v. Jago, Case No. SC12–838;Chmura v. Sam Rodgers Properties, Inc., Case No. SC12–1460; and Chmura v. The Sanctuary Pelican Pointe HOA, Case No. SC12–1462.
To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition, we hereby deny relief because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977).
To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, the petition is hereby dismissed as legally insufficient.
To the extent that petitioner seeks to invoke this Court's all writs jurisdiction, the petitions are hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the petitioner has failed to cite an independent basis that would allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority and no such basis is apparent on the face of the petition. See Williams v. State, 913 So.2d 541 (Fla.2005); St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304 (Fla.1980).
Finally, to the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, we hereby deny relief for failure to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10 (Fla.2000).
Any motions or other pending requests for relief are hereby denied.