From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiu v. Trump

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:22-cv-0764 KJM AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0764 KJM AC

10-26-2022

TAIFUSIN CHIU, Plaintiff, v. DONALD TRUMP/STORAGE/CHOKE ME STORY, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On May 11, 2022 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, though he has filed a letter and two unauthorized amended complaints. ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[Determinations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 11, 2022, are adopted in full;
2. All claims against all defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice; and
3. This case is closed.


Summaries of

Chiu v. Trump

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:22-cv-0764 KJM AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Chiu v. Trump

Case Details

Full title:TAIFUSIN CHIU, Plaintiff, v. DONALD TRUMP/STORAGE/CHOKE ME STORY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0764 KJM AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)