From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chism v. Tri-State Constr., Inc.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Sep 28, 2016
186 Wn. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

No. 93220–4

09-28-2016

Geoffrey Chism, Respondent, v. Tri–State Construction, Inc and Larry Agostino, Petitioners.


ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 27, 2016 Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the Petition for Review is denied and the Respondent's request for attorney fees is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Chism v. Tri-State Constr., Inc.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Sep 28, 2016
186 Wn. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

Chism v. Tri-State Constr., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Geoffrey Chism, Respondent, v. Tri–State Construction, Inc and Larry…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

186 Wn. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2016)
186 Wash. 2d 1013
380 P.3d 497