From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chisholm v. Toplitz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1904
178 N.Y. 599 (N.Y. 1904)

Summary

In Chisholm v. Toplitz (82 A.D. 346; affd. on opinion below, 178 N.Y. 599) the defendant was an administrator c.t.a. and was sued in his individual capacity for rent. His decedent was a lessee for a term which did not expire until one year after the death of decedent.

Summary of this case from Durand v. Lipman

Opinion

Argued April 4, 1904

Decided April 26, 1904

Richard L. Sweezy for appellant.

William H. Van Benschoeten and John M. Bowers for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Not voting: O'BRIEN, J.


Summaries of

Chisholm v. Toplitz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1904
178 N.Y. 599 (N.Y. 1904)

In Chisholm v. Toplitz (82 A.D. 346; affd. on opinion below, 178 N.Y. 599) the defendant was an administrator c.t.a. and was sued in his individual capacity for rent. His decedent was a lessee for a term which did not expire until one year after the death of decedent.

Summary of this case from Durand v. Lipman
Case details for

Chisholm v. Toplitz

Case Details

Full title:MARY A. CHISHOLM, Respondent, v . HARRY L. TOPLITZ, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1904

Citations

178 N.Y. 599 (N.Y. 1904)

Citing Cases

Durand v. Lipman

Their interest might dictate that course, for otherwise the value, if any, of the structures then in…