From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chisholm v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 28, 2016
135 A.D.3d 1279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

520953.

01-28-2016

In the Matter of Christopher CHISHOLM, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Christopher Chisholm, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Christopher Chisholm, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of nine charges stemming from three separate misbehavior reports. Respondent concedes, and we agree, that substantial evidence does not support the determination of guilt with respect to the third misbehavior report, which charged petitioner with smuggling and possessing a controlled substance. Accordingly, we annul that part of the determination, but need not remit the matter for a redetermination of the penalty given that petitioner has already served the penalty and no loss of good time was imposed (see Matter of Branch v. Annucci, 133 A.D.3d 942, 943, 18 N.Y.S.3d 567 2015; Matter of Edwards v. Annucci, 131 A.D.3d 770, 770, 14 N.Y.S.3d 598 2015 ). Turning to the first and second misbehavior reports, we find that petitioner has abandoned any challenge to the findings of guilt with respect to the charges contained therein inasmuch as his brief is limited to challenging the third misbehavior report (see Matter of Robinson v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d 981, 982, 994 N.Y.S.2d 477 2014; Matter of Carter v. Fischer, 117 A.D.3d 1262, 1262, 984 N.Y.S.2d 896 2014 ). Finally, petitioner's claim that he was denied a fair and impartial hearing is not substantiated by the record (see Matter of Canzater–Smith v. Selsky, 28 A.D.3d 899, 900, 813 N.Y.S.2d 254 2006 ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of smuggling and possessing a controlled substance as charged in the third misbehavior report; petition granted to that extent and respondent is directed to expunge all references to these charges from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

PETERS, P.J., GARRY, LYNCH and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chisholm v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 28, 2016
135 A.D.3d 1279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Chisholm v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER CHISHOLM, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 28, 2016

Citations

135 A.D.3d 1279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 567
23 N.Y.S.3d 597

Citing Cases

McBride v. Annucci

Accordingly, we annul that part of the determination. Given that no loss of good time was imposed and…

Dushain v. Annucci

Accordingly, we annul that part of the determination. Given that no loss of good time was imposed and…