From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiprez v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
1:21-cv-00668-DAD-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00668-DAD-BAM (PC)

09-29-2021

JESUS CHIPREZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Jesus Chiprez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 15, 2021, the Court dismissed the federal claims asserted in the first amended complaint, with prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims, dismissed those claims, without prejudice to the claims being asserted in state court. (ECF No. 18.) Judgment was entered accordingly the same date. (ECF No. 19.) On September 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 20.)

On September 29, 2021, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred the matter back to this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

The Court finds that this appeal is not taken in bad faith and is not frivolous. Accordingly, in forma pauperis status should not be revoked and should continue on appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chiprez v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
1:21-cv-00668-DAD-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Chiprez v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:JESUS CHIPREZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00668-DAD-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)