Chipman v. US Bank N.A.

Full title: JUDY CHIPMAN, Plaintiff, v. US BANK N.A., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Dec 14, 2010

Case No. 2:10-cv-483-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Dec. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-483-FtM-29SPC.

December 14, 2010

ORDER

SHERI CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Joinder of Necessary Parties (Doc. #25) filed on December 13, 2010. Plaintiff pro se Judy Chipman seeks joinder of Wells Fargo Bank as a necessary party to this action. On December 13, 2010, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint that named Wells Fargo as a Defendant (Doc. #26). Thus, Defendant Wells Fargo is a potential party to the case and is subject to service of process by the Plaintiff. Joinder is not required at this point. Plaintiff is required to serve Wells Fargo Bank in compliance with the Federal Rules.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff's Motion for Joinder of Necessary Parties (Doc. #25) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 14th day of December, 2010.