From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chipman v. Nelson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2770 GEB EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2770 GEB EFB PS

04-03-2012

RICKIE L. CHIPMAN, Plaintiff, v. MARCIA F. NELSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 12, 2012, the court granted plaintiff until March 30, 2012 to file an amended complaint in this action. Dckt. No.64. Then, on March 28, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for an extension of that deadline. Dckt. No. 65. Many of the defendants named in plaintiff's original complaint filed oppositions to that request. Dckt. Nos. 66-73. However, on March 30, 2012, plaintiff filed her first amended complaint. Dckt. No. 74. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for an extension of time to amend, Dckt. No. 65, is denied as moot.

_____________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Chipman v. Nelson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2770 GEB EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Chipman v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:RICKIE L. CHIPMAN, Plaintiff, v. MARCIA F. NELSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2770 GEB EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)