From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chipman v. Hibberd

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1856
6 Cal. 162 (Cal. 1856)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District.

         Action for damages for cutting down growing trees. The opinion of the Court discloses the error upon which the judgment of the Court below is reversed.

         COUNSEL

          E. W. F. Sloan, for Appellant.

          Chas. H. S. Williams, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray. Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

         OPINION

          MURRAY, Judge

         The Court erred in laying down the measure of damages. The true rule was not the actual value of the trees for fire-wood, but the damage done to the land by reason of destroying them. This damage should have been estimated by all the circumstances, and the purposes for which the trees were used or designed, and not according to the " speculative or fancied ideas" that the jury or plaintiff might have drawn of their worth.

         Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.


Summaries of

Chipman v. Hibberd

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1856
6 Cal. 162 (Cal. 1856)
Case details for

Chipman v. Hibberd

Case Details

Full title:CHIPMAN v. HIBBERD

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1856

Citations

6 Cal. 162 (Cal. 1856)

Citing Cases

Shearer v. Park Nursery Co.

(Montgomery v. Locke , 72 Cal. 75; Sedgwick on Measure of Damages, 6th ed., 152; Mitchell v. Billingsley , 17…

Rilovich v. Raymond

The measure of the damage was the amount of depreciation in the value of the land caused by the loss of or…