From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chipman v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2008
No. 2:04-cv-00712-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-00712-MCE-DAD P.

February 28, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 24, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Chipman v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2008
No. 2:04-cv-00712-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Chipman v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. CHIPMAN, Petitioner, v. DIANA K. BUTLER, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-00712-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)