Opinion
2:20-cv-1792 JAM DB P
12-20-2021
SHU CHINSAMI, Plaintiff, v. JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. /// ///
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2021, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's claims based on his allegations that a computer lens was implanted in his eye are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous.