From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chinnici v. Curtis Kaplan, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 8, 1967
194 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35910.

February 8, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Israel Abrams, Miami, for petitioner.

Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fee is also denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chinnici v. Curtis Kaplan, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 8, 1967
194 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Chinnici v. Curtis Kaplan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK CHINNICI, PETITIONER, v. CURTIS KAPLAN, INC., CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 8, 1967

Citations

194 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1967)