From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 12, 2021
2:19-cv-09302-MCS-E (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-09302-MCS-E

10-12-2021

HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for NEC, a Minor; MARIANA MANUKYAN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF OF POLICE MICHEL MOORE; OFFICER ROMERO GONZALEZ; OFFICER MARIO MENESES; SERGEANT FRED CUETO; OFFICER RODRIGO SORIA; OFFICER AIRAM POTTER; OFFICER BRITTANY OKE; OFFICER JEFF ROOD; OFFICER DANIEL MARTINEZ; OFFICER DANIEL GAYTON; OFFICER EDUARDO PICHE; and, DOES 8-10, inclusive, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

MARK C. SCARSI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and by reason of the Court's orders in this action and the jury's special verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

By reason of the special verdict, prior dismissals by Plaintiffs, and the Court's ruling on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for NEC, and MARIANA MANUKYAN recover nothing by reason of each and all of their claims as set forth in the First Amended Complaint against CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE MICHEL MOORE, OFFICER ROMERO GONZALEZ, OFFICER MARIO MENESES, SERGEANT FRED CUETO, OFFICER RODRIGO SORIA, OFFICER AIRAM POTTER, OFFICER BRITTANY OKE, OFFICER JEFF ROOD, OFFICER DANIEL MARTINEZ, OFFICER DANIEL GAYTON, and OFFICER EDUARDO PI CHE. Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants.

Defendants may file an Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs. CD. Cal. L.R. 54-2. The Court will address any arguments both Parties raise concerning Defendants' ability to recover costs upon the filing of a Motion to Retax Costs. Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 12, 2021
2:19-cv-09302-MCS-E (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for NEC, a…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 12, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-09302-MCS-E (C.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2021)