China National Chemical Construction Chongqing Co. v. Kit Kung

Full title: CHINA NATIONAL CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CHONGQING COMPANY; Chongqing…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 28, 2008

280 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 06-35436, 07-35167, 07-35227.

Submitted May 28, 2008.^_

_ The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed May 28, 2008.

Baolin Chen, Portland, OR, for Petitioners-Appellants.

Justine Fischer, Esq., Law Office of Justine Fischer, Portland, OR, Patrick J. Monaghan, Esq., Monaghan Monaghan Lamb Marchisio LLP, Montvale, NJ, Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CV-05-00350-ALH/JMS, CV-06-00771-ALH/JMS.

Before TALLMAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,^__ Senior United States District Judge.

__ Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

ORDER^___

___ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

This case is resubmitted as of the date of this order.

The parties' joint motion to dismiss these actions is GRANTED. Each side shall bear its own costs.

The Clerk shall issue the mandate forth-with.

DISMISSED.