Chin v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation

Full title: DAVID CHIN, KEVIN L. SULLIVAN, MARVIN KIRSCHENBAUM, BRUCE McCUTCHEON…

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 12, 2007

Civil Action No. 95-5569 (JCL) (D.N.J. Jun. 12, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 95-5569 (JCL).

June 12, 2007

GRAHAM CURTIN A Professional Association Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant DaimlerChrysler Corporation OF COUNSEL: Theodore Boutrous, Jr., Esq, William Thomson, Esq., Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, California, John W. Rogers, Esq., BryanCave LLP, St. Louis, MO.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

JOHN LIFLAND, Senior District Judge

Notice is hereby given that DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("DCC"), defendant in the above named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from any and all rulings, orders, and decisions in any way adverse to DCC, including but not limited to the District Court's determination that Plaintiffs were "successful" under the California Code of Civil Procedure and awarding Plaintiffs Attorney Fees in the amount of $4,654,433.14, which includes but is not limited to the following Orders entered in this action:

1. Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees in the sum of $4,654,433.14 entered in this action on the 15^th day of May, 2007 (Docket Entry No. 222);

2. Order Declaring Plaintiff David Chin to be Successful Under California Code of Civil Procedure entered in this action on the 9^th day of November, 2006 (Docket Entry No. 214);

3. Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and Vacating Order of Dismissal of the Action for Lack of Jurisdiction entered in this action on the 5^th day of December, 2005 (Docket Entry No. 202);

4. Order Granting Reconsideration of December 14, 1999 Order entered in this action on the 13^th day of August, 2003 (Docket Entry No. 193);

5. Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery on Catalyst Issue entered in this action on the 14^th day of December, 1999 (Docket Entry No. 153);

6. Order Granting Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Dismissal entered in this action on the 30^th day of November, 1999 (Docket Entry No. 152); and

7. Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, In Whole or In Part, All Five Counts of the Seconded Amended Class Action Complaint entered in this action on the 7^th day of March, 1997 (Docket Entry No. 58).