From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chimes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 30, 2011
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-05375 (JSW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-05375 (JSW)

11-30-2011

CHIMES PHARMACY, INC.; JAMES CLAYWORTH, R.Ph., an individual, d/b/a CLAYWORTH PHARMACY; MARIN APOTHECARIES, INC., d/b/a ROSS VALLEY PHARMACY; GOLDEN GATE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC., d/b/a GOLDEN GATE PHARMACY; PEDIATRIC CARE PHARMACY, INC.; MARK HORNE, R.Ph., an individual, d/b/a BURTON'S PHARMACY; MEYERS PHARMACY, INC.; TONY MAVRANTONIS, R.Ph., an individual, d/b/a JACK'S DRUG; JULIAN POTASHNICK, R.Ph., an individual, d/b/a LEO'S PHARMACIES; and TILLEY APOTHECARIES, INC., d/b/a ZWEBER'S APOTHECARY; RP HEALTHCARE, INC., Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER, INC., PFIZER IRELAND, PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER-LAMBERT EXPORT, LTD., RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RANBAXY, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, LTD, and DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, Bijal V. Vakil, Esq. WHITE & CASE LLP Counsel for Defendant Pfizer Inc. Theresa D. Moore, Esq. ALIOTO LAW FIRM Counsel for Plaintiffs WHITE & CASE LLP Bijal V. Vakil Attorney for Defendant Pfizer Inc.


BIJAL V. VAKIL (SBN 192878)

WHITE & CASE LLP

Counsel for Defendant Pfizer Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Hon. Jeffrey S. White

WHEREAS the Complaint in the above-captioned action was filed on November 7, 2011; and

WHEREAS Plaintiffs served Defendant Pfizer Inc. ("Pfizer") with a copy of the Complaint on November 9, 2011, and Pfizer's nominal deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is November 30, 2011; and

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Pfizer have met and conferred on this issue in good faith;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Plaintiffs and Pfizer, through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Pfizer to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint shall be extended to and including January 12, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

Bijal V. Vakil, Esq.

WHITE & CASE LLP

Counsel for Defendant Pfizer Inc.

Theresa D. Moore, Esq.

ALIOTO LAW FIRM

Counsel for Plaintiffs

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, Bijal V. Vakil, hereby attest in accordance with General Order No. 45.X that Theresa D. Moore, Counsel for Plaintiffs has provided her concurrence with the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

WHITE & CASE LLP

Bijal V. Vakil

Attorney for Defendant Pfizer Inc.

ORDER

Pursuant to the above Stipulation filed in this action, it is hereby ORDERED that the time within which Pfizer Inc. may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended to and including January 12, 2012.

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Chimes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 30, 2011
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-05375 (JSW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Chimes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHIMES PHARMACY, INC.; JAMES CLAYWORTH, R.Ph., an individual, d/b/a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-05375 (JSW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)