From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chilton v. Kelly

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 24, 2011
452 F. App'x 348 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6623

10-24-2011

THOMAS A. CHILTON, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Thomas A. Chilton, III, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:10-cv-00871-JRS)

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas A. Chilton, III, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Chilton, III, seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for a change of venue. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Chilton seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Ellicott Mach. Corp. v. Modern Welding Co., 502 F.2d 178, 180 (4th Cir. 1974). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Chilton v. Kelly

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 24, 2011
452 F. App'x 348 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Chilton v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS A. CHILTON, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

452 F. App'x 348 (4th Cir. 2011)