From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chilson-Cline v. Poole

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Nov 8, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

990 TP 19–00835

11-08-2019

In the Matter of Denise CHILSON–CLINE, Petitioner, v. Sheila J. POOLE, Acting Commissioner, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, and Eileen Tiberio, Commissioner, Ontario County Department of Social Services, Respondents.

THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PATRICK A. WOODS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT SHEILA J. POOLE, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.


THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PATRICK A. WOODS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT SHEILA J. POOLE, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County [Craig J. Doran, J.], dated May 1, 2019) to review a determination of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services. The determination denied petitioner's request that an indicated report maintained in the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment be amended to unfounded.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul a determination, made after a fair hearing, denying her request to amend to unfounded an indicated report of child maltreatment and to seal that report. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the determination that she maltreated the subject children and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to employment in the childcare field is rational (see Matter of Natasha W. v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 32 N.Y.3d 982, 984, 85 N.Y.S.3d 391, 110 N.E.3d 503 [2018] ) and supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Lauren v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 147 A.D.3d 1322, 1322–1323, 47 N.Y.S.3d 537 [4th Dept. 2017] ). We therefore confirm the determination and dismiss the petition.


Summaries of

Chilson-Cline v. Poole

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Nov 8, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Chilson-Cline v. Poole

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DENISE CHILSON-CLINE, PETITIONER, v. SHEILA J. POOLE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 8, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 1318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
177 A.D.3d 1318
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 8054