Opinion
No. 63026
04-29-2013
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Appellant seeks to challenge the district court's oral ruling denying reconsideration of the denial of a motion to strike. No appeal may be taken, however, from a district court's oral ruling. Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987). Moreover, as no final judgment has been entered, Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) (providing that a final judgment is one that disposes of all issues pending in a case and leaves nothing for the district court to resolve except for post-judgment matters such as attorney fees and costs), and no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the decision appellant seeks to challenge, see NRAP 3A(b) (setting forth the orders and decisions from which an appeal may be taken); Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984) (pointing out that this court generally has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when authorized by statute or court rule), even if a written order had been entered, the challenged ruling would not be appealable. Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction, we
In light of this order, appellant need not file the proper person appeal statement.
______________, J.
Gibbons
______________, J.
Parraguirre
______________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge
Donald Richard Childs, II
Boyack & Beck
Eighth District Court Clerk