From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Childress v. Knowles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 10, 2008
263 F. App'x 602 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-15618.

Filed January 10, 2008.

Lawrence A. Gibbs, Esq., Law Office of Lawrence A. Gibbs, Berkeley, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

David A. Rhodes, DAG, Mary Jo Graves, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior Judge.

The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


The memorandum disposition filed November 28, 2007, 256 Fed.Appx. 976, is withdrawn, and an memorandum disposition is being filed contemporaneously with this order. With that filing, the petition for rehearing is denied.

The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no judge requested a vote for en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED, and no further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be filed.


Summaries of

Childress v. Knowles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 10, 2008
263 F. App'x 602 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Childress v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LEE CHILDRESS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MIKE KNOWLES, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

263 F. App'x 602 (9th Cir. 2008)