Opinion
No. 116855.
September 12, 2000.
COA: 215756, Michigan, Wayne CC: 91-132888-DM.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the March 14, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. This denial is without prejudice to appellant's filing a new action under the Paternity Act. Because the appellant was not a participant in the divorce action, appellant is not bound by any decision of the court in that action with regard to the date of the child's conception. Appellant would be free in a paternity action to allege and prove that the child was conceived and born after the divorce of his mother.
We do not retain jurisdiction.