Opinion
Civil Action 20-216
08-03-2022
JEFFREY SOLOMON K. CHIJIOKE-UCHE,[1] Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2022, after considering Defendants' motions for summary judgments (ECF Nos. 44, 46) and the responses thereto, as well as Plaintiff's crossmotions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 47, 48) and the responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, as follows:
1. Chapman Chevrolet, LLC's (“Chapman Chevrolet”) motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment against Chapman Chevrolet (ECF No. 47) is DENIED;
3. General Motors, LLC's (“General Motors”) motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claim, and DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claims for breach of warranty and violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act;
4. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment against General Motors (ECF No. 48) is DENIED;
5. Chapman Chevrolet's cross-claim against General Motors for indemnification is DISMISSED;
6. Chapman Chevrolet is DISMISSED from this action.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.