Summary
In Chief Aircraft, Inc. v. Grill, 272 Or.App. 330, 353 P.3d 1261 (2015), we affirmed the court's ruling, relying on our decision in Neumann, 261 Or.App. at 580, 323 P.3d 521, in which we held that the defendant's online criticism of a wedding venue was factual in nature, such that it was not protected by the First Amendment if false, and that the plaintiff had met its burden to survive an anti-SLAPP motion.
Summary of this case from Chief Aircraft, Inc. v. GrillOpinion
Nos. 12CV1156 A155317.
07-15-2015
CHIEF AIRCRAFT, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Eric GRILL, Defendant–Appellant.
Linda K. Williams, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Daniel W. Meek. Michael J. Mayerle, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hornecker Cowling LLP.
Linda K. Williams, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Daniel W. Meek.
Michael J. Mayerle, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hornecker Cowling LLP.
Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge, and TOOKEY, Judge.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.Affirmed. Neumann v. Liles, 261 Or.App. 567, 323 P.3d 521, rev. allowed, 356 Or. 516, 340 P.3d 47 (2014).