From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chick's Auto Body v. St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 18, 1980
176 N.J. Super. 320 (App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

Argued November 5, 1980 —

Decided November 18, 1980.

Before Judges FRITZ, POLOW and JOELSON.

Appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County.

I. Michael Heine argued the cause for appellants.

Arthur Meisel argued the cause for respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ( Jamieson, McCardell, Moore, Peskin Spicer, attorneys).

John P. Hauch, Jr. argued the cause for respondent Insurance Company of North America ( Archer, Greiner Read, attorneys). William J. O'Shaughnessy argued the cause for respondent Aetna Life Casualty ( Clapp Eisenberg, attorneys).

Michael A. Orlando argued the cause for respondent Government Employees Insurance Company ( Orlando Slimm, attorneys).

David M. Satz, Jr., and Alan H. Silberman of the Illinois Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent Allstate Insurance Company ( Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz Goldstein, attorneys; Alan H. Silberman, of counsel).

Stephen R. Dumser argued the cause for respondent Keystone Insurance Company ( Schuenemann Gercke, attorneys).

Frederick F. Fitchett argued the cause for respondent Ohio Casualty Company ( Bleakly, Stockwell Zink, attorneys).


We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the considered and able opinion of Judge Deighan in the trial court.


Summaries of

Chick's Auto Body v. St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 18, 1980
176 N.J. Super. 320 (App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Chick's Auto Body v. St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHICK'S AUTO BODY, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, SALUGA SONS BODY SHOP, A SOLE…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Nov 18, 1980

Citations

176 N.J. Super. 320 (App. Div. 1980)
423 A.2d 311

Citing Cases

State v. Scioscia

In our view, the statutory exception is designed to obviate potential conflicts where a public utility is…

Boardwalk Properties v. BPHC

While a private litigant may financially gain from a suit under the statute, the overriding purpose of the…