From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chicarelli v. Marion Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Apr 29, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV146 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV146

04-29-2013

ANDREW L. CHICARELLI, Petitioner, v. MARION COUNTY, DAVID R. JANES, and GEORGE TRENT, Respondents.


(Judge Keeley)


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 17, 2012, the pro se plaintiff, Andrew Chicarelli ("Chicarelli") filed suit against Marion County, West Virginia, Judge David Janes, and Warden George Trent, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. Nos. 1, 7). On October 26, 2012, Chicarelli moved for an injunction and a hearing. (Dkt. No. 13). The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull for initial screening and a report and recommendation in accordance with LR PL P 2. On March 11, 2013, Magistrate Judge Kaull issued an Opinion and Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), in which he recommended that Chicarelli's § 1983 suit be denied and dismissed with prejudice. (Dkt. No. 25). The magistrate judge determined that Chicarelli's complaint had no chance for success because the defendants were either immune from a § 1983 claim, are not subject to suit under § 1983, or a § 1983 claim is otherwise barred on the facts presented in Chicarelli's complaint.

The R&R also specifically warned Chicarelli that his failure to object to the recommendation would result in the waiver of any appellate rights he might otherwise have on this issue. He did not file any objections. Consequently, finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation insofar as it orders dismissal of Chicarelli's claims (dkt. no. 25) and ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and stricken from the Court's docket.

The failure to object to the Report and Recommendation not only waives the appellate rights in this matter, but also relieves the Court of any obligation to conduct a de novo review of the issue presented. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-153 (1985); Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1997).

It is so ORDERED.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a separate judgment order and to transmit copies of both orders to counsel of record and to the pro se petitioner, certified mail, return receipt requested.

____________________________

IRENE M. KEELEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chicarelli v. Marion Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Apr 29, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV146 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Chicarelli v. Marion Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW L. CHICARELLI, Petitioner, v. MARION COUNTY, DAVID R. JANES, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV146 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 29, 2013)