Chicago v. Broan-Nutone

1 Citing case

  1. Integrity v. Broan-Nutone

    521 F.3d 914 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 51 times
    Concluding that district court correctly found ventilation fan was "designed to make the property more useful and valuable," in part, because fan "was required by Minnesota building codes"

    Doing our best to anticipate what the Minnesota Supreme Court would do with this challenging diversity question, we affirm. Because the separate cases arise out of virtually identical circumstances, and rely on the same legal analysis regarding the applicability of Minnesota Statute ยง 541.051, this opinion will be incorporated by reference in the Chicago Avenue Partners, Ltd. v. Broan Nutone, LLC, No. 07-1784, 2008 WL 918752 (8th Cir. 2008) opinion. For this reason, we refer to both Integrity and CAP in discussing the issues.