From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Rich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 20, 1916
158 P. 358 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 6552

Opinion Filed June 20, 1916.

Justices of the Peace — Review of Decisions — Security — Deposit.

The procedure for taking appeals from the justice to the county or district court is provided in the statutes, and the only provisions therein for securing the costs is by giving an appeal bond, and the appellate judge has no right or authority to require the appellant to make a cash deposit to cover the costs in the appellate court.

(syllabus by Mathews, C.)

Error from County Court, Johnston County; Chas. S. Fenwick, Judge.

Action by A.M. Rich against the Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed, with instructions.

Newman Lawrence, C.O. Blake, and W.H. Moore, for plaintiff in error.

Ratcliff Looney, for defendant in error.


The question raised by this appeal involves the right of the county or district judge to require the appellant on appeal from the justice of the peace court to make a cash deposit to cover the costs in the appellate court and to dismiss the appeal upon the failure to comply with such a requirement.

This exact question was passed upon by this court in the case of St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. McAllister, 56 Okla. 244, 155 P. 1123, and was there answered in the negative. Following that case we recommend that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions that the dismissal be set aside and same reinstated.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Rich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 20, 1916
158 P. 358 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Rich

Case Details

Full title:CHICAGO, R.I. P. RY. CO. v. RICH

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 20, 1916

Citations

158 P. 358 (Okla. 1916)
59 Okla. 187

Citing Cases

In re Durkee's Will

We have also held that a court cannot require a cash deposit in lieu of a bond. C., R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Rich,…