These unit sales were adjusted by the court for size, utility, and time, in a manner consistent with approaches recommended by the State's appraiser. Consequently, although the court's determination was not entirely free of error, its valuation of the subject property should not be disturbed, because it is essentially fair, reasonable and within the range of the conflicting expert testimony (Levin v State of New York, 13 N.Y.2d 87, 92-93; West Seneca Cent. School Dist. v State of New York, supra; Glazer v State of New York 54 A.D.2d 1077; Brown v State of New York, 52 A.D.2d 1079; Chiarulli v State of New York, 49 A.D.2d 677; Miller Paper Co. v State of New York, 34 A.D.2d 880).