From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiaramonte v. Hornstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1917
180 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

October, 1917.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.


Appellants have not complied with rule 41, and also have failed to excuse their delay under our special rule by showing from the facts out of which the controversy arose that the appeal has any merit. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Chiaramonte v. Hornstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1917
180 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Chiaramonte v. Hornstein

Case Details

Full title:CATERINA CHIARAMONTE, Respondent, v. GEORGE HORNSTEIN and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1917

Citations

180 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)