From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chiafullo v. Schwab

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Apr 1, 1910
13 Cal.App. 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910)

Opinion

Civ. No. 719.

April 1, 1910.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Brittan Raish, for Appellant.

W. H. Carlin, for Respondent.


This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground "that more than forty days have elapsed since the taking of said appeal and no transcript on appeal has been prepared, served or filed," and respondent also asks the court to assess damages for the "taking of a vexatious appeal for delay." The notice of appeal was given and filed on January 13, 1910, and an undertaking was filed on the same day. Nothing further seems to have been done in the prosecution of the appeal and no excuse is offered for the delay. The notice of the motion to dismiss was given on March 6th and appellant did not appear at the hearing. Under the circumstances we must assume that the purpose of appellant in taking the appeal was as stated by respondent.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, with damages against appellant assessed at $30.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Chiafullo v. Schwab

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Apr 1, 1910
13 Cal.App. 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910)
Case details for

Chiafullo v. Schwab

Case Details

Full title:FRANK CHIAFULLO, by His Guardian ad Litem, ANTONIO CHIAFULLO, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Apr 1, 1910

Citations

13 Cal.App. 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910)
109 P. 36

Citing Cases

Hitshew v. Dern

Harold I. Bacheller, for the motion. The appeal is without reasonable cause and taken for delay; the judgment…